Living in Los Angeles, Yelp has been a great tool for me. I have used it constantly over the past few years to discover new restaurants and find great recommendations. But rumors of Yelp’s somewhat shady business practices have started surfacing over the past year.
These rumors have now turned into a class action lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles federal court, on behalf of a veterinary hospital. The hospital contacted Yelp asking them to remove a negative review, and claims that Yelp representatives demanded a fee of $300 per month to hide or delete the review. Judging by the number of previous reports of this type of behavior, this lawsuit could snowball into a massive problem for Yelp.
When these rumors first surfaced, I have to admit, I was rather surprised. Not at the allegations themselves, but the fact that Yelp selected a business model that put itself in this position in the first place.
Any user generated review site has an inherent credibility problem: any public user can sign up and easily post a fake review. I’ve seen this done repeatedly, and I’ve also been asked to do it occasionally (I didn’t bother). If your site is focused around user generated reviews of businesses, you need to be doing your best to ensure the credibility of those reviews. If users don’t trust your reviews, they aren’t going to bother showing up at your site anymore.
This is why it makes absolutely no sense to me that Yelp selected a business model that inherently compromises the integrity of their site. It seems like they could have found a dozen other ways to make money. Charging business owners $300 per month for featured listings that make the bad reviews go away wink wink nudge nudge seems like the wrong way to go. They are already fighting an uphill battle to gain credibility in the eyes of users, why make it even more difficult?
At this point, it doesn’t matter so much whether the allegations are true or not. This type of negative PR is anathema to a review site, and could easily drive their userbase to other competitors. Especially now that location based services have taken off and there are dozens of other companies doing very similar things.
Maybe they should have taken the $500 million from Google while they still had the chance…
Comments